2011 Event Evaluations
Don’t take our word for the quality of this event. Here are our event evaluations for 2011 completely uncut and uncensored
by Adrian Segar
As is customary for Conferences That Work, we are publishing all the (anonymized) evaluations for EventCamp East Coast 2011. So often, this information is restricted to conference organizers. I think this kind of transparency is important for any event, as it provides participants with feedback on how their experience compared with their peers, publicizes the positive and negative responses to the event, and sets the stage for the whole conference community to discuss ways to make future events better.
Let’s start with the ratings for the various sessions. I have amalgamated the ratings for the peer sessions.
Evaluation ratings |
Roundtable |
Peer sessions |
Personal Introspective |
Group spective |
Informal discussions |
High |
79% |
73% |
62% |
70% |
80% |
Medium |
21% |
24% |
23% |
20% |
20% |
Low |
0% |
3% |
15% |
10% |
0% |
And here are participants’ comments on various aspects of the conference.
Pre-conference communications |
Really loved the SMS text updates. This was very useful. |
I felt there was a lot of communication regarding travel needs and what I should expect from the conference. There was also some reading material but not too much! |
Loved getting the text updates! |
Good |
Timely and had the info I needed when I needed it. |
Loved the text messaging. |
I appreciate the communication prior to the event. It was helpful to receive emails about airport information, check-in, attire, etc. before arriving on site. At some conferences, there is absolutely no communication until you arrive on-site. Thank you! Continue reading → |
Like this:
Like Loading...